This thread will document my recent trip to San Sebastian (retracing Robert Brown’s steps as he described in eG article, San Sebastian Dining: Akelare to Zuberoa) and Madrid. Since I realized that I may not have the opportunity to register my experience at every deserving restaurant in the same detail as I managed for Arzak (see my next post), I decided to “cheat” and reuse a personal letter (with some additional thoughts at the end) I put together for a friend, to provide a general perspective. My intention is, however, to describe in subsequent posts as many places as the time will permit.
Perhaps the most interesting observation is that the five restaurants we visited in San Sebastian (Arzak, Berasategui, Akelare, Mugaritz and Zuberoa), located in relative proximity to each other, with chefs sharing the same traditional roots and utilizing predominately the same ingredients, offered such disparate cuisines, differing one from another if not by genre (mostly a contemporary angle, with Zuberoa on the more conservative end), then by style and philosophy.
Arzak, however, we placed on a pedestal above its rivals. It is not that the technique utilized in Arzak was more advanced than in Mugaritz or Beratesegui, for instance. It is that Elena managed to dethrone haute cuisine, bringing it down to the rustic level of tradition, rather than simply apply regional ingredients in a modern fashion to produce a more generic, homogenized taste, characteristic of the contemporary haute fare. Each dish, inspired by local fare, took on a more refined taste, with economy of expression and most precise rhythmic movement, catching its mood so that after a single try it was hard to imagine the principal ingredient without the accompaniment.
Considering Juan Mari and Adria’s close relationship, I was wondering whether “Adria syndrome” affected Elena in a negative way, as was reported by some old-timers, but all dishes were spectacular, and some interesting approaches, like the utilization of the agar agar sea vegetable instead of an animal gelling agent, melded into the composition naturally. The only part of our dining experience where I noticed a slight dissonance was in desserts, which I found less strong then the main courses.
Aduritz, while having absorbed the best from his San Sebastian elders and Adria, managed to develop his own unique signature. With a very distinct style, less persistent in the pursuit of tradition than Arzak and supercharged with the modernism and symbolism of herbal infusions, Mugaritz was a highlight of our trip, and I might’ve placed it at the top of the hierarchy if not for the occasional disconnect between some infusions and their accompanying main ingredients. In fact, the process with which Aduritz creates his dishes starts with the infusion or the sauce first, and only then does the chef choose the main ingredient to “accompany” the accompaniment. When it works, it is simply exceptional; when the marriage is less successful, it brings to mind Johann Reichardt and his complaints about certain vocalists and their interpretation of his songs. Reichardt used to point out that most singers would first play the notes, as if they constituted an independent melodic composition, and only then added the words, instead of forcing melodies to spring naturally from repeated reading of the poem. The various stresses in a dish should be so perfectly blended, one with another, that the “melody” should ring true and lie easily on the voice. I found Arzak’s cuisine more forceful and mature in this regard, but Mugaritz charmed us with Aduritz's inventiveness, excellent flavor balance and gracious presentation. It was the second best meal of our trip.
Berasategui will be slightly more difficult to place, probably because my husband left the restaurant underwhelmed, contrary to my impression, but I placed it third. The décor (apparently, they repainted the walls(?)) and the service have improved since Robert Brown’s visit, though his criticism of the tableware still stands, and the room was packed, mostly with Spaniards. As insurance against disappointment, I requested the addition of the dish Robert praised the most (creamy rice with octopus, which indeed proved to be excellent) to the tasting menu and, to our utmost surprise, a newly printed version of the menu with the inclusion of the risotto was brought to our table in a minute or two, with the first amuse arriving shortly after.
In comparison, Berasategui was indeed the only restaurant approximating in ambiance the three-star dining experience we had in Paris. The cuisine alone, however, characterized in several words, was either calm and restrained at its best or boring and monotonous at its worst, though always technically proficient. Berasategui’s style reminded me at times slightly of Gagnaire’s, and the contemporary French influence in his dishes seemed to be so apparent that I took the liberty of asking Berasategui whether he considered the backbone of his cuisine to be French. A flash of pain and horror ran across his face as if from the news that thousands of Frenchmen had just attacked the City Walls of Hondarribia and, as if squeezing every word out of himself, while energetically gesticulating and shrugging his shoulders up and down (I am only slightly exaggerating), he replied “No. Besides, we all know that French cuisine is on the verge of its death!” I quietly retreated from pursuing this question.
Overall, I enjoyed our meal, but wouldn’t recommend Berasategui as a destination restaurant if pressed for time over Zuberoa or even Akelare, considering that you can get a similar but stronger meal in France.
At Zuberoa, we made the mistake of building a tasting from the carte instead of ordering the chef’s menu. The regular menu was very heavy on foie gras and truffles, and our attempt to construct the tasting wasn’t successful in that I couldn’t get a broad perspective on Arbelaitz’s cuisine, despite the advantage of having the opportunity to compare dishes with similar ingredients. There were several misses, and not all ingredients were of the finest quality, but his classic or classic-French style and decorative manner, with an abundant utilization of luxury ingredients, including butter (so uncharacteristic of the region), produced a cuisine – sometimes subtle and refined (poached egg with pigeon paste and celery and truffle sauce), sometimes rich and rustic (a traditional dish of braised lamb and mashed potatoes, which could be typical of the French bistro meal as well) – of almost an exquisitely mannerist sensibility. He seemed to be the only chef who gently discarded Adria, indicating that his own roots lay along a more classical path oriented toward taste first with technique secondary. The good service and solid food of a two-star establishment was our conclusion, but no spark of Arzak, no thrill of Mugaritz, and no technical glow of Berasategui were present.
Akelare’s cuisine – we ordered the dégustation menu – was slightly more aggressive and direct, with an occasional overuse of sweetness, which led to a flavor imbalance in dishes otherwise interesting conceptually (oysters and grapes three ways), kitchen mistakes (overcooking), and unsuccessful experiments with dishes atypical of the region (stringy, tough and chewy roasted fresh bacon, prepared according to our waiter in a non-traditional way, a better version of which could be found at Gramercy Tavern). Though some of the savory courses were below expectation, the restaurant’s location and décor, the service, some interesting modernistic ideas, an occasional good, solid dish (veal with mustard), excellent desserts and Subijana’s charm made our lunch very enjoyable.
There was a group of diners seated behind us who were apparently known to the house and for whom Subijana took the order and delivered dishes himself. Curiosity took hold of me at some point and I inconspicuously turned around to peek at what dishes were served to the special guests. I was quite surprised to see a large portion of chipirones en su tinta (squid in their own ink), the most fundamental, traditional dish one can easily find in a good, rustic, local fish restaurant, like Hermandad or Loreduna in Hondarribia, sitting in front of the satisfied guest. Indeed, our best dish of the evening was the rustic veal, and I wondered whether despite Subijana’s active involvement in the 'nueva cocina' movement, the dishes to order to experience his cuisine at its best should be old, traditional Basque classics.
If I were to evaluate desserts only, Akelare would’ve been placed first with Mugaritz and Berasategui close behind. Considering that desserts are generally (and sadly) not accorded the same respect as other parts of the meal, their description often finding either no or little place in people’s reviews (I am not an exception) – perhaps somewhat understandably, since at the end of the meal, your senses are fatigued, your attention is distracted, and your ability to judge critically the dish could be diminished by the length and the overall abundance of the meal – when desserts suddenly awake your interest at the time you can hardly imagine forcing down another piece of food, special points are awarded to the chef or pastry chef.
Desserts and petit fours at Akelare, though not subtle and light (qualities more characteristic of desserts at Berasategui or Mugaritz), but rather full-bodied and slightly more sugary than I would generally favor, were very well conceived, imaginative, and executed excellently. In fact, observing desserts at other tables, I was so intrigued that I was about to order more desserts from the carte, when my consort gently indicated that he’d refuse to indulge my subsequent complaints of excessive weight-gain, but I was, of course, free to do as I wished. The “right to complain” won, but I feel cheated even to this moment.
Our least favorite meal was at La Broche in Madrid: a poorly orchestrated flow of dishes in miniscule portions. In fact, each dish in isolation was interesting, though not exciting, and the portions were appropriate for their flavor combinations; however, there was a sense of lack of substance and artificial symbolism, as if the dishes were not created spontaneously but through laborious and tedious experimentation with deliberately disparate ingredients, which resulted in pretty and perhaps interesting, but soulless food. The décor was somewhat claustrophobic, reminiscent of either a sterile laboratory or a white path to heaven, with the provision of small bites of exotic buffet food for the souls before their Judgment day, with an occasional reminder of worldly matters in the form of art work suspended from the ceiling, depicting what looked like the post-war horrors of hanging body parts.
My husband looked utterly bored, until he had the opportunity to observe my fruitless dialogs with the profoundly incompetent server, who would refuse even to provide us with the Spanish terms for an ingredient, responding simply, “It is a secret,” and running away from our table as fast as he could. The petit fours were simply described as “It is very complicated.” Arola didn’t make rounds of the half-empty dining room, unlike the other chefs, though he came out of the kitchen as we were leaving, apparently to take a look at the couple who “tortured” his service staff on their way out. I had no interest in initiating a conversation.
There are many discussions of Spanish starred restaurants on eGullet, reflecting the service in a somewhat negative light compared to France, for instance. Indeed, globalization promotes unification among countries and affects our expectations to be fulfilled uniformly, in a model spreadsheet of behavioral conduct that applies to different areas of human activity, and perhaps especially so to service. Considering that restaurants in Europe are evaluated by the same Michelin, theoretically the standards applied to “setting the scores” should be identical in every country, thus enforcing our expectations of high-end service to be that of the same rank everywhere. However, perhaps due to some traditional constraints, it may not be easily achievable, and sometimes I wonder whether unification won’t kill the charm so closely identified with local customs, even if the service is inferior or rather different from what fits our criteria of perfection.
In general, I noticed a tendency affecting the service, closely related to market demand. Indeed, local diners, being a majority in all the restaurants, seemed more interested in the overall experience, free of interruption, including that from the service staff, whose role, therefore (restricted to the short presentations upon the dishes’ arrival), was that of a shadow, and whose main function was to disappear as quickly as possible. More often than not the servers had superficial and rather general knowledge of the dishes, with any additional questions requiring a special trip to the kitchen, which seemed to terrify them (as it didn’t seem customary to interrupt the chef during the busy dinnertime), resulting in their attempt either to avoid the situation completely by running away (our La Broche experience) or suggesting that questions be saved until the chef was able to address them directly. Almost all chefs made rounds of the dining room and were more than happy to engage in conversation, showing appreciation for your interest in their art. Perhaps you won’t be able to get answers while you are actually eating a dish, but in my case, I considered this to be somewhat advantageous, as it allowed me to reach my own conclusions (rightly or wrongly) before being influenced by actual knowledge, having my own post-revelations ever so slightly more satisfying.
Times change, and sometimes no matter how rigidly some societies attempt to preserve their own ways of life, people rebel and change the rules, so that when I read Gault-Millau’s “Dining in France,” published in 1986, warning women not to wear pants or pantsuits to a three-star restaurant, I chuckle, remembering plenty of women-pants during my recent trip to Paris. As much as I enjoy being walked to the ladies room as at Lucas Carton, or watching the silent march of gaunt servers at L’Ambrosie and its never-changing protocol of silent “announcement” of the dishes, with one of the servers, holding a large, heavy metal tray, swinging on his tippy toes to the sides under the tray’s weight while desperately trying to restore his balance, I can also see that this type of service nearly, and perhaps sadly, is becoming obsolete. Whether it is economic hardship that forces French chefs to cut costs and find new compromises in establishing a more casual service, or a new market demand that favors a less formal approach, the service at starred places like L’Arpege, Gagnaire, L’Astrance, Les Ambassadeurs (more ceremonial) though very good, was relatively informal, which makes me wonder whether in time it would not be Spain that will adjust restaurant service and dining to a more formal standard, but rather France that will continue amending its traditions down to jeans, short sleeves and casual, homey and perhaps even less competent service.














