AM/FM Receiver bit the dust!!
#1
Posted 05 January 2010 - 01:01 AM
I have the electronic LW Erath speakers which I want to keep.
Any suggestions as to what would be an eminently suitable replacement for this receiver which has served us so well?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . Pete/Houston
SOAC . . .
. . "for the discreet and refined enjoyment of uncommon wine . .
. . . . and victuals and the companionship accruing thereto" . . . .
#2
Posted 05 January 2010 - 01:59 AM
I have the electronic LW Erath speakers which I want to keep.
Any suggestions as to what would be an eminently suitable replacement for this receiver which has served us so well?
Get a good amplifier and stream your radio signals from the internet.
#3
Posted 05 January 2010 - 02:32 AM
G, Thanks, but I haven't been happy with the radio signals through the Internet.
I want an AM/FM receiver that will serve the same purpose(s) as the Sansui 2000A which has served us so well for so long, including handling tape/CD/etc. inputs effectively.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . Pete/Houston
SOAC . . .
. . "for the discreet and refined enjoyment of uncommon wine . .
. . . . and victuals and the companionship accruing thereto" . . . .
#4
Posted 05 January 2010 - 12:26 PM
Photography is jazz for the eye. - William Claxton
#5
Posted 05 January 2010 - 02:24 PM
Gordon, Thanks!
I was not aware that "power limits" might be an issue.
Since my L W Erath speakers are electronic, I have what's called an equalizer between the receiver and the speakers.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . Pete/Houston
SOAC . . .
. . "for the discreet and refined enjoyment of uncommon wine . .
. . . . and victuals and the companionship accruing thereto" . . . .
#6
Posted 05 January 2010 - 08:38 PM
Gordon, Thanks!
I was not aware that "power limits" might be an issue.
Since my L W Erath speakers are electronic, I have what's called an equalizer between the receiver and the speakers.
I'm not sure it is but I wouldn't want my AV receiver pushing it's THX gigunda wattage through my antique KEF 105s
Photography is jazz for the eye. - William Claxton
#7
Posted 06 January 2010 - 01:00 AM
Gordon, Your sound advice steered me well.
As a result, I have landed a used Kenwood receiver which should serve as a suitable replacement for my (beloved) Sansui. (I say "beloved" because I bought it on our honeymoon in duty-free Jamaica.)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . Pete/Houston
SOAC . . .
. . "for the discreet and refined enjoyment of uncommon wine . .
. . . . and victuals and the companionship accruing thereto" . . . .
#8
Posted 06 January 2010 - 12:35 PM
Photography is jazz for the eye. - William Claxton
#9
Posted 06 January 2010 - 03:47 PM
Even if you live to be 100, life is short.
#10
Posted 06 January 2010 - 04:12 PM
Can anyone answer this question?
I have LWE (Erath) electronic speakers which are fantastic. Because they are electronic, I have an equalizer between the receiver and the speakers.
My Sansui which is failing was rated at 35 watts per channel. The Kenwood I will be installing is rated at 80 watts per channel.
Other than perhaps being a bit more careful with the volume, are there any other precautions that I should take so that the speakers are not endangered?
Thanks!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . Pete/Houston
SOAC . . .
. . "for the discreet and refined enjoyment of uncommon wine . .
. . . . and victuals and the companionship accruing thereto" . . . .
#11
Posted 06 January 2010 - 04:34 PM
I have LWE (Erath) electronic speakers which are fantastic. Because they are electronic, I have an equalizer between the receiver and the speakers.
My Sansui which is failing was rated at 35 watts per channel. The Kenwood I will be installing is rated at 80 watts per channel.
Other than perhaps being a bit more careful with the volume, are there any other precautions that I should take so that the speakers are not endangered?
Thanks!
What impedance is listed for the ratings?
What are the details of the power ratings for the speakers?
#12
Posted 06 January 2010 - 04:58 PM
I'm not sure what you mean by this.
A quick look online suggests that these speakers use a "clip kit" to feed an intermediate signal from the amplifier into the electronics of the speaker and therefore the speaker cables were more than two-conductor.
Is this what you have with your current receiver?
#13
Posted 06 January 2010 - 06:34 PM
I'm not sure what you mean by this.
A quick look online suggests that these speakers use a "clip kit" to feed an intermediate signal from the amplifier into the electronics of the speaker and therefore the speaker cables were more than two-conductor.
Is this what you have with your current receiver?
S, I can't recall having heard the term "clip kit". What I have has been called, I believe, an equalizer. It says Erath EQ Stereophonic on top of it. It is probably 4" x 6" x 3", give or take with lots of cables going into it.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . Pete/Houston
SOAC . . .
. . "for the discreet and refined enjoyment of uncommon wine . .
. . . . and victuals and the companionship accruing thereto" . . . .
#14
Posted 06 January 2010 - 06:52 PM
I'm not sure what you mean by this.
A quick look online suggests that these speakers use a "clip kit" to feed an intermediate signal from the amplifier into the electronics of the speaker and therefore the speaker cables were more than two-conductor.
Is this what you have with your current receiver?
S, I can't recall having heard the term "clip kit". What I have has been called, I believe, an equalizer. It says Erath EQ Stereophonic on top of it. It is probably 4" x 6" x 3", give or take with lots of cables going into it.
The stuff I read indicated people using 60w and higher clipped amps to drive the speakers so the power may not be a big deal. Good luck.
#15
Posted 06 January 2010 - 07:06 PM
S, I don't understand this. It almost sounds like more power (e.g. 80watts per channel in my case) could be a problem!?!
[EDITED TO ADD] I finally wised up and called my friend the audio/video expert. He, like you, says the power should not be a problem. He also says this stronger receiver should generate even better sound.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . Pete/Houston
SOAC . . .
. . "for the discreet and refined enjoyment of uncommon wine . .
. . . . and victuals and the companionship accruing thereto" . . . .

Help















